Book a Demo

One agreed list everything else refers to

The one agreed list of organisations, facilities, devices and instrument models that every other system refers to. Nobody opens it directly. It is what stops the same hospital being spelled four ways, so figures from different places can be added together.

Registry
Uganda · national instance
Organisations1,284
Instrument models3,910
Facilities and sites18,442
Connected systems62
One list, from country down to bench
CountriesDistrictsHospitalsDepartmentsLabs
Nobody sees this directly. It is what makes the same instrument mean the same thing in every report.
18,442
facilities and sites
3,910
instrument models
1
record per thing

The problem

The same hospital, spelled four ways

Every system keeps its own list of facilities, devices, and organisations, and none of them agree. So a district total is not the sum of its facilities, an instrument appears three times under three spellings, and every new integration begins by rebuilding a mapping table somebody already built.

Figures that cannot be added together across systems
The same device counted more than once, or missed entirely
A mapping table rebuilt for every integration

What it holds up

Nobody opens it. Everything depends on it.

This is the one part of MedX with no screen of its own. You notice it when a national figure reconciles on the first attempt instead of the third.

Every lab result, tagged to a real facility
Every instrument, counted once
Every district total, summed from real rows
Every partner, referring to the same organisation

One catalogue

One name for everything.

Organisations, facilities, departments, and instrument models all resolve to a single agreed record. Places are deliberately one kind of thing, so a country, a district, a hospital and a bench sit in the same list and roll up cleanly.

  • Countries, districts, hospitals, departments and labs in one hierarchy
  • Instrument models named once, however many sites run them
  • Aligned with recognised catalogues rather than codes invented locally
Organisations1,284
Instrument models3,910
Facilities and sites18,442
Connected systems62
One list, from country down to bench
CountriesDistrictsHospitalsDepartmentsLabs
Nobody sees this directly. It is what makes the same instrument mean the same thing in every report.

Governance

Nothing goes in unchecked.

New entries are reviewed before anyone else sees them, and each one keeps a record of who submitted it. The shared list stays worth trusting instead of filling up with duplicates and guesses.

  • Submissions queue for review before they are visible
  • Provenance travels with every record
  • Shared, organisation-only, or restricted to named partners
Mindray BC-30s
Instrument model · submitted by Everight Diagnostics
In review
Fort Portal RRH · Laboratory
Department · reviewed 2 days ago
Approved
District reporting system
Connected system · waiting on a reviewer
Queued
Who can see what
Shared
everyone on the network
Your organisation
your sites only
Restricted
named partners only

Offline

A bad link does not stop a lab.

Each site keeps its own copy of the lists it needs. A lab in a district with unreliable connectivity can still register a sample against the right facility and the right instrument, with no network at all.

  • The lists a site actually uses, held on that site
  • Registering work never waits on the connection
  • Updates arrive when the link returns, without anyone intervening
Site copy up to date · last checked 06:00Offline ready
Held at this site
Facilitiesthe district's health facility list
Organisationspartners this site works with
Instrumentsevery model in use here
Each site holds only the lists it actually needs
Registering work never depends on the connection being up.

Put every site and device in one list.

We deploy on-premises or in the cloud. Our team will walk you through a live instance scoped to your organisation.